Chosen justice question particularly relevant for the regulatory/policy framework (in the light of JUSTNORTH research, aimed at supporting future justice-focused research on Arctic governance):
General: What is expressed/defined as “just” within the governance framework?
General: What is the idealized vision of the future state that the framework is to achieve (e.g. as expressed in introduction to legal acts)?
Multilevel perspective: How different levels of governance interact to produce justice?
Weighting values: Does the framework promote certain values and interests at the expense of others? Whose interests are being promoted?
Procedural justice: What are the opportunities for participation in decision-making and who is envisaged as a stakeholder?
Inclusion and participation: Are all relevant stakeholders included in the governance/decision-making process and are there any important stakeholders who are excluded?
Capabilities: Does the framework promote or hinder capabilities of affected/involved “stakeholders”?
Climate justice: What measures have been put in place to ameliorate the climate change effects?
Environmental justice and ethics: Are there any systemic practices of racism, oppression, patriarchy, colonialism and privilege that shape the distribution of environmental harms and benefits?
Intergenerational justice: What implications does the framework have for future generations?
Humans and nature: How are human-nature relations treated in the governance framework (is the framework or its elements anthropo-, bio- or eco- -centric)?
Humans and nature: Is the environment treated as a value in itself?
Rights: Which rights and rights frameworks are expressly included in the governance framework, which are missing? |