Chosen justice question particularly relevant for the regulatory/policy framework (in the light of JUSTNORTH research, aimed at supporting future justice-focused research on Arctic governance):

Weighting values: Does the framework promote certain values and interests at the expense of others? Whose interests are being promoted? Is the framework trying to strike a balance, promote certain interests or obscure the tensions within society, including individual vs group/community/global community interests?

Climate justice: How does the instrument affect the climate change?
Climate justice: How is the implementation of a law/policy affected by climate changes?
Climate justice: Who bears the burden of any costs associated with climate effects goverened by the law/policy?

Climate justice: What measures have been put in place to ameliorate the climate change effects?

Climate justice: Who pays the cost of climate change mitigation and adaptation measures? Who reaps the benefits from climate policies and low-carbon transition projects?

Climate justice: How have decisions been made concerning the climate effects? Was anybody excluded from the decision-making process with respect to climate mitigation and adaptation actions?

Rights: Which rights and rights frameworks are expressly included in the governance framework, which are missing?